Ranking Categories > Academic Selection

Academic Selection

Which Swiss universities truly
foster entrepreneurship?

An independent ranking of 26 Swiss universities, universities of applied sciences and research institutes.
Measured against the HEInnovate framework — with one key addition: the voices of spin-off founders
and programme alumni count for 35%
of every institution's score.

Validate now
  • HEInnovate-aligned (EU-OECD)
  • Spin-off founders + programme alumni surveyed
  • 26 institutions independently pre-researched

What you gain

Three concrete outcomes
for your next phase.

Selection Badge

Silver, Gold, Platinum or Diamond — a verified quality signal for your pitch deck, website, and investor conversations. Issued only after independent expert review.

Visibility for investors & partners

Your ranked profile is published in the NZZ media environment and actively used by Swiss investors, accelerators, and corporates as a curated deal-flow and scouting source.

Honest peer benchmark

Your score is calculated exclusively within your stage (Early / Growth / Scale) and sector. A Pre-Seed HealthTech is never compared to a Series B Fintech — ensuring a fair, actionable result.

Institution Types

Three institution types.
Three separate rankings.

An ETH cannot be fairly compared to a university of applied sciences. Each type has a different research-to-spin-off pathway, different output volumes, and different ecosystem roles. Three independent rankings with thresholds calibrated to each type's real data.

No cross-type comparison. A Diamond UAS is a Diamond UAS — not "above" or "below" a Diamond Research Institute. Each discipline has its own calibrated thresholds and minimum review requirements.

Universities

12 Institutions

Research-driven, deep-tech spin-offs, full academic spectrum

Min. 12 reviews total  ·  at least 4 spin-off founders

ETH · EPFL · UZH · UniBas · UniBE · UNIGE · UNIL · HSG · USI · UniNE · UniFR · UniLU

Universities of Applied Sciences

9 Institutions

Application-oriented, SME proximity, regional anchoring

Min. 10 reviews total  ·  at least 3 spin-off founders

ZHAW · FHNW · BFH · OST · HSLU · HES-SO · SUPSI · FHGR · ZHdK

Research Institutes

5 Institutions

Frontier research, highly selective spin-offs, patent-driven

Min. 8 reviews total  ·  at least 3 spin-off founders

Empa · PSI · Eawag · WSL · CSEM

The core differentiator

35% of every score comes from the people institutions exist to serve.

HEInnovate measures what institutions have and do. We add what HEInnovate cannot: what founders and alumni actually experienced. Two separate surveys — one for spin-off founders, one for programme alumni — are combined into one Founder Voice dimension.

 

FOUNDER VOICE · 35% OF SELECTION SCORE

Two surveys. One dimension. Weighted 60 / 40.

Spin-off founders speak about the research commercialisation experience — IP terms, TTO quality, the real path from lab to company. Programme alumni speak about education quality — what changed after the Pioneer Fellowship, the Innogrant, or the START Accelerator. Both voices are anonymous, aggregated, and independently verified.


SPIN-OFF FOUNDERS · 60%

People who turned research into a company

Researchers, PhD students, and postdocs who founded a company based on IP from this institution. They are identified independently via Crunchbase and the Startup-Switzerland database — preventing the survival bias that comes from institution-curated lists. Your TTO can nominate founders we may have missed.

21%

OF TOTAL SELECTION SCORE

  • Did the institution actively support or hinder your spin-off journey?
  • How fair were the IP licensing terms with the TTO?
  • Would you have founded without this institution?
  • Was the TTO helpful or bureaucratic?
  • Would you recommend other researchers here to spin out?

PROGRAMME ALUMNI · 40%

People who completed institution-owned programmes

Participants of programmes owned, funded, and operated by the institution — ETH Pioneer Fellowship, EPFL Innogrant, HSG START Accelerator, BFH Capacity Accelerator, etc. Affiliated programmes (Wyss Zurich, Be-Advanced, BaselArea programmes, Microcity) are excluded to maintain clean institutional attribution.

14%

OF TOTAL SELECTION SCORE

  • Did the programme change the trajectory of your startup?
  • Was the mentoring quality high enough to matter?
  • Did the programme open doors — investors, clients, talent?
  • Was the effort-to-value ratio worth it?
  • Would you recommend this programme to other founders?

 

  • 35% TOTAL FOUNDER VOICE WEIGHT
  • 60/40 SPIN-OFFS TO PROGRAMME ALUMNI
  • 100% ANONYMOUS & AGGREGATED

Founders who completed a programme and later spun out count once — as spin-off founders. The spin-off is the stronger outcome signal. Double-counting the same person would inflate scores for institutions where a small group of prominent founders appears in both surveys.

Three data sources.
Five dimensions. One ranking per discipline.

Institutional data compiled independently from public sources, anonymous founder voice from two independent surveys, and expert assessment from the Swiss ecosystem — each source feeds its own dimensions. Single-layer model, no double weighting. Data points that are identical across all 26 institutions are excluded from scoring as they cannot differentiate.

1 Data Collection — pre-filled, dual founder survey, expert-rated
Founder Voice · 35% of score
Dual Founder Survey
Anonymous · aggregated · independently verified

60%
Spin-off founders
40%
Programme alumni
Pre-filled · TTO validates
Institutional Data
Compiled by independent research team
Annual reports · Crunchbase · Innosuisse
TTO corrects & validates — ~30 min
Expert Assessment
Ecosystem Experts
Swiss investors · coaches · hub leads
Rates Knowledge Exchange dimension
Only experts who know the institution
↓  0–10 pts per item · thresholds calibrated to upper quartile per institution type  ↓
2 Five Sub-Indices — HEInnovate aligned, founder voice dominant
Founder Voice
35%
Dual survey
Spin-off Track Record
22%
Public data
Entrepreneurial Capacity
20%
TTO · programmes
Knowledge Exchange
13%
Expert-rated
Funding & Resources
10%
Budget · grants
Pillar 1
Leadership & Governance
Pillar 2
Organisational Capacity
Pillar 3
Entrepreneurial Teaching
Pillar 4
Knowledge Exchange
Pillar 5
Impact & Society
Scoring Formula — Total Score 0 to 100
Score = 0.35Founder Voice + 0.22Track Record + 0.20Capacity & Education + 0.13Knowledge Exchange + 0.10Funding & Resources
Same weights, different thresholds — calibrated from real Swiss data. ETH's 150+ spin-offs and Uni Luzern's 3+ spin-offs each convert to discipline-relative scores. Items identical across all 26 institutions are excluded from scoring.
Minimum review requirements differ by type — Universities: 12 total (≥4 spin-off founders) · UAS: 10 total (≥3) · Research Institutes: 8 total (≥3). Spin-off founders are identified independently via Crunchbase — preventing survival bias from institution-curated lists.
3 Selection Status — four levels per institution type
Silver 70 – 79.9 Top 30%
Gold 80 – 89.9 Top 15%
Platinum 90 – 94.9 Top 5%
Diamond ≥ 95.0 Top 1%
3 Institution Types · 26 Total
Universities 12 UAS 9 Research Institutes 5
= 3 Independent Rankings Calibrated thresholds per type · no cross-type comparison
A Diamond UAS ≠ above or below a Diamond Research Institute

Weighting of the five dimensions

Dimension Weight What is measured
Founder Voice 35% Spin-off founders (60%) + programme alumni (40%) · anonymous & independently aggregated
Spin-off Track Record 22% Number of spin-offs created, active spin-offs, patents licensed — verified against public databases
Entrepreneurial Capacity & Education 20% TTO existence and quality, entrepreneurship programmes, infrastructure, curriculum depth, student participation
Knowledge Exchange & Ecosystem 13% Industry partnerships, investor engagement, regional role — rated by independent experts from the Swiss ecosystem
Funding & Resources 10% Innovation budget, direct grants to founders, grant volume and frequency

The framework

Built on HEInnovate.
Strengthened with founder voice.

The EU-OECD HEInnovate framework defines what it means to be an Entrepreneurial University across five pillars. We adopt these pillars and add what HEInnovate cannot measure from desk research alone: what founders and alumni actually experienced.

HEINNOVATE · EU-OECD JOINT INITIATIVE

Entrepreneurial impact is more than spin-off counts.

A truly entrepreneurial university aligns its leadership, organisation, education, industry partnerships, and societal output. Our methodology maps five HEInnovate pillars to five scoring dimensions — then sharpens the result with direct founder feedback that no institutional self-report can replace.

PILLAR 1

Leadership & Governance

PILLAR 2

Organisational Capacity

PILLAR 3

Entrepreneurial Teaching

PILLAR 4

Knowledge Exchange

PILLAR 5

Impact & Society

Selection Badges

Four levels.
One clear signal.

Badges are awarded based on your normalised cohort score. Only the top performers in each
stage and sector receive a badge — ensuring the signal stays meaningful.

Silver

Score 70 – 79

Gold

Score 80 – 89

Platinum

Score 90 – 94

Diamond

Score ≥ 95

How to participate

Four steps. Pre-filled for you.
Your TTO validates.

Unlike other Selection categories, institutions don't build profiles from scratch. An independent research team pre-fills the institutional data from public sources. Your TTO validates in 30 minutes. The dual founder survey runs in parallel — independently of you.

01

Your profile is pre-filled

An independent research team compiles your institutional data from annual reports, Crunchbase, Innosuisse records, and public sources. You receive the draft via your TTO contact for review.

02

TTO validates and corrects

Review pre-filled answers, correct inaccuracies, complete missing items. Sensitive figures (exact budgets) stay confidential — only ranges appear publicly.

03

Dual founder survey runs independently

Spin-off founders are identified independently via Crunchbase and the Startup-Switzerland database. Your TTO nominates additional founders we may have missed. Programme alumni are contacted via your programme records. Both surveys run 6–8 weeks.

04

Score, report, and badge

Your final score with per-dimension breakdown and HEInnovate pillar mapping arrives before public release. Nothing goes live without your TTO sign-off.

Your Data

You share a lot.
We share nothing.

The assessment requires detailed information about your startup.
Here is exactly what we do — and do not — do with it.

What we do

  • Store all data on Swiss servers (DSG- and GDPR-compliant)
  • Quantitative claims cross-checked against Crunchbase, Innosuisse, SECA
  • Share anonymised aggregate statistics with ZHAW for research
  • Institution can request profile delisting at any time
  • No third-party transfer, no commercial use of institutional data
Ready to participate?

Validate your institution profile.

Your institutional data is pre-filled from public sources. Your TTO validates in 30 minutes. Spin-off founders and programme alumni speak anonymously. You control the publication step.

Validate now
DSG- & GDPR-compliant / 12 UNIVERSITIES / 9 UAS / 5 RESEARCH INSTITUTES